If your looking for a tort recipe that has your favorite blue bird in it, then dont be disappointed. Rather this is about how technology changes our laws, the we interact with those laws, amongst many other things. I am fascinated by how technology does this, however, not so fascinated with patent law and things of that nature, it all requires a lot more science and math then I wish to delve into!Be careful of what you post on twitter! Here is a article in the Chicago SunTimes, on a apartment resident complaining about her apartment management company, then getting sued for “maliciously and wrongfully” posts. The tenet stated on her twitter post:
“Who said sleeping in a moldy apartment was bad for you? Horizon realty thinks it’s okay.”
Love the way technology is shaping the laws of the future! Its just incredible how our legal system works and then how technology plays into the role of developing, challenging, molding how we cope with the constructed system of rules, policy and norms. For example, now our English language has words like "tweet" and "twitter":
posted a "tweet on Twitter, thereby allowing the tweet to be distributed throughout the world.”
The Chicago Decider had this to add too on defamation, which is good for all you social media users out there:
This is Chicago’s first Twitter-related case, according to Evan Brown, an intellectual property and technology lawyer with local firm Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP. He says Horizon might have a case. All it has to do is prove a defamatory statement was published, adding, “In defamation law, publication has a special meaning—all it means is that words were uttered, or made available to someone else.” Even just one person, and regardless of the medium (blogs, IM conversation, real-life conversation). “It’s not enough for the defendant to say, ‘I was on Twitter’… It is a tool through which a person can defame another.”
Defamation occurs when falsities are asserted as facts, and when that assertion hurts an individual’s or business’ reputation. A tweet about the management company being a bunch of morons, Brown explains, would be protected speech; the sentence can’t be proved true or false, since it’s based on someone’s opinion. But a statement about mold in an apartment isn't up for debate; the mold exists or it doesn't. “No reasonable person would think her assertion of mold is mere opinion,” Brown says. “It’s an assertion of fact, 140 characters or not.”
Being in the "publishing" world in a quasi sort of way due to the public arena of social media raises lots of challenges for individuals! That raises another issue, how many cases out there that are based on social media.
So the first ever twitter lawsuit award goes to, none other then- Courtney Love, there are an abundent amount of articles out there on this lawsuit. The gist is that Love got upset with a designer and tweeted away with racial slurs and ranting about the designer with a long, long, long list of tweets, myspace and other social media posts on the designer (Dawn Simorangkir). Said designer ran to local "sue-first-ask-questions-later" attorney and the un-holy union of pissed of designer and trail-park Love is born the tweeter lawsuit legal department in ritzy law firms across the United States.
Here are some other tweety-torts:
Cardinals manager Tony La Russa recently settled his prior defamation lawsuit against Twitter, here.
Likewise, Mark Cuban, the owner of the Dallas Mavericks, was fined $25,000 for a tweet about the refereeing of his team’s 103-101 loss to Denver, here.
Fun times on tweeter!








